These are the cases you ll select (one at first) from to examine innovation in an unfamiliar field (literature, psychology, science, or sociology) and relate the challenges innovators faced to the problem the innovator needed to solve.... Pick one of the above--you can do more, but certainly arent required to--and locate the reading in e-Reserves. One of the big obstacles in studying innovation is the idea that there are creative types--brilliant trailblazers like Steve Jobs, Oprah Winfrey, Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, Stevie Wonder, and the cases above--who just pursue never-been-done-before paths. If thats the case, then its the birth lottery that determines wholl be innovators and who wont. Doesnt that let the rest of us off the hook pretty easily? Lets see if we can try on the problem-solving explanation for size and, if it works out, view the innovators in a new light. Could it be that theyre not a wholly different lot, but quite similar to people we encounter all the time, except more purposeful, risk-tolerant, focused, and persistent, as well as, occasionally, luckier? If youre wondering why these are a) old and b) not about technology, heres the reason. Were looking at innovations not necessarily for their use of new technology, but for problem-solving in a new way.Answer
These are the cases you ll select (one at first) from to examine innov
These are the cases you ll select (one at first) from to examine innovation in an unfamiliar field (literature, psychology, science, or sociology) and relate the challenges innovators faced to the problem the innovator needed to solve.... Pick one of the above--you can do more, but certainly arent required to--and locate the reading in e-Reserves. One of the big obstacles in studying innovation is the idea that there are creative types--brilliant trailblazers like Steve Jobs, Oprah Winfrey, Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, Stevie Wonder, and the cases above--who just pursue never-been-done-before paths. If thats the case, then its the birth lottery that determines wholl be innovators and who wont. Doesnt that let the rest of us off the hook pretty easily? Lets see if we can try on the problem-solving explanation for size and, if it works out, view the innovators in a new light. Could it be that theyre not a wholly different lot, but quite similar to people we encounter all the time, except more purposeful, risk-tolerant, focused, and persistent, as well as, occasionally, luckier? If youre wondering why these are a) old and b) not about technology, heres the reason. Were looking at innovations not necessarily for their use of new technology, but for problem-solving in a new way.Answer
0 Comments